Goodspeed wrote: "Thank you for your note. I saw your letter to the editor earlier in the week. I’m not sure when you had your off-the-record chat with the NEVERYOUMIND*, but the situation in northern Uganda has been in flux.There was a significant drop in “night commuters” last year, when the peace talks first started. People began to move out of the large DP camps to return to their homesteads and life did begin to return to “normal” for the first time in 20 years. Unfortunately, when the peace talks stalemated and broke down in December, the situation began to change. There was an increase in “night commuters” and people began to return to the larger camps.
Any number of NGOs that are active on a daily basis in the region will tell you this."
Goodspeed went on to name a few of his sources, individuals and organizations.
I was impressed he responded to me in the detail he did and my respect for him has grown.
He's correct in his characterization of conflicts in general. The reading I've done tells me conflict is constantly in flux, "front lines" change and shift, things flare up, things cool down. As such what one can say about what area today could change in an hour or day or month or what have you. I'd completely forgotten the nature of conflict and as such, am glad he reminded me.
I'm still waiting on my source to confirm what Goodspeed sources tell him as I'm still skeptical. I just don't trust NGOs anymore.
But here's the deal: regardless of whether or not night commuters still exist in northern Uganda the fact is the conflict there has produced death on a grand and boring scale. Night commuters are sexy, an easy selling point. People starving in camps? Not so much.
It's a damn shame NGOs and people who care have to sell, but such is this world.